2

Conversations: Part Two

You are cur­rently browsing com­ments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Conversations: Part Two”.

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Jim says:

    My, My Thad.
    You have cre­ated quite the theory!

    I’m not an degree holding physi­cist, but I spend most of my free time (when I’m not working in elec­tronics & audio engi­neering) reading mate­rial on these issues and trying to create a new model of space-time.
    If there’s a way that I could pos­sibly show you the model I came up with, please let me know. I’d like to know your thoughts on it and I’m curious to know where I’m falling short in my under­standing. I think you may find some of my ideas fit very well with yours and opens a few more pos­si­bil­i­ties into the fabric of space-time that may not be addressed yet.

    in addi­tion, PLEASE post more con­tent!
    this is the most promising theory I’ve ever heard of and I’m excited to see more.

    • Thad Roberts says:

      Jim,

      Thank you. I’d love to dis­cuss what you’ve come up with so far. We need many more people doing exactly what you are doing. The only way we are going to make great progress is if many people start having the courage to think out­side the frame­work that is keeping them trenched into the same old same old. Respond here or send me an email to start our dis­cus­sion. I can also send you a pre-print of the book, which goes into much greater detail about the impli­ca­tions of the geom­etry as it stands now.

      Thad

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.